# camofox-browser vs usque

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | usque |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #29 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 12 039 ✓ | 1 507 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +282 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.2.1 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 53/100 for usque, so it is the safer default.

camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for usque.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; usque needs more configuration.

camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+282 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [usque](https://selfhost.directory/project/usque) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/usque.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-usque