# camofox-browser vs Urocissa

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | Urocissa |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 12 041 ✓ | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +284 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.

Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.

camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+284 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [Urocissa](https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-urocissa