# camofox-browser vs unraid-config-guardian

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | unraid-config-guardian |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #38 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 12 041 ✓ | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +284 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.6.1 · 16 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 46/100 for unraid-config-guardian, so it is the safer default.

camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unraid-config-guardian.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; unraid-config-guardian needs more configuration.

camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+284 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [unraid-config-guardian](https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-unraid-config-guardian