# camofox-browser vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 12 030 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; uMap needs more configuration.

camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-umap