# camofox-browser vs TraceRoot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | TraceRoot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #11 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 12 048 ✓ | 1 145 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +291 ✓ | +33 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 58/100 for TraceRoot, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; TraceRoot needs more configuration.

camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+291 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [TraceRoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/traceroot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traceroot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-traceroot