# camofox-browser vs torqvoice

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | torqvoice |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #4 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 035 ✓ | 45 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +278 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.2.64 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 42/100 for torqvoice, so it is the safer default.

torqvoice ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; torqvoice needs more configuration.

camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+278 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [torqvoice](https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-torqvoice