# camofox-browser vs Huginn

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | Huginn |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #2 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 12 031 | 50 165 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 ✓ | +181 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Huginn scores 80/100 against 75/100 for camofox-browser, so it is the safer default.

camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Huginn.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Huginn needs more configuration.

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-huginn