# camofox-browser vs figranium

> Two self-hosted [Browser Automation projects](https://selfhost.directory/browser-automation), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | figranium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #6 of 11 in Browser Automation |
| GitHub stars | 12 030 ✓ | 778 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v0.21.2 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 52/100 for figranium, so it is the safer default.

figranium ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; figranium needs more configuration.

camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [figranium](https://selfhost.directory/project/figranium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/figranium.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-figranium