# Calibre Web vs tunesynctool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Calibre Web | tunesynctool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 18 487 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +247 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 0.6.27 · 8 Aug 2026 ✓ | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Fluent | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Calibre Web scores 78/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

Calibre Web ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.

If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.

Calibre Web is growing faster right now (+247 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Calibre Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/calibre-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/calibre-web.md)
- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/calibre-web-vs-tunesynctool