# Calibre Web vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Calibre Web | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 18 488 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +248 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.6.27 · 8 Aug 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Fluent | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Calibre Web scores 78/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Calibre Web.

If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Calibre Web is growing faster right now (+248 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Calibre Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/calibre-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/calibre-web.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/calibre-web-vs-tube-archivist