# Calibre Web vs rebacklogs

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Calibre Web | rebacklogs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #36 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 18 485 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +254 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.6.27 · 8 Aug 2026 ✓ | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Fluent | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Calibre Web scores 78/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.

rebacklogs ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Calibre Web.

If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web is easier to run; rebacklogs needs more configuration.

Calibre Web is growing faster right now (+254 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Calibre Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/calibre-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/calibre-web.md)
- [rebacklogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/calibre-web-vs-rebacklogs