# Calibre Web vs qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Calibre Web | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #1 of 7 in Torrent |
| GitHub stars | 18 488 ✓ | 1 758 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +248 ✓ | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 52 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.6.27 · 8 Aug 2026 | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Fluent | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Calibre Web scores 78/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Calibre Web.

Calibre Web is growing faster right now (+248 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Calibre Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/calibre-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/calibre-web.md)
- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/calibre-web-vs-qbittorrent-linuxserverio