# Calibre Web Automated vs LAN-Orangutan

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Calibre Web Automated | LAN-Orangutan |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 508 ✓ | 1 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.

Calibre Web Automated ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.

If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; Calibre Web Automated needs more configuration.

Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Calibre Web Automated](https://selfhost.directory/project/calibre-web-automated) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/calibre-web-automated.md)
- [LAN-Orangutan](https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lan-orangutan.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/calibre-web-automated-vs-lan-orangutan