# Calibre vs transcriber

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Calibre | transcriber |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Ebook Management | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 26 273 ✓ | 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +264 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v9.17.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Calibre scores 83/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

Calibre ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

If you want the quickest setup, Calibre is easier to run; transcriber needs more configuration.

Calibre is growing faster right now (+264 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Calibre](https://selfhost.directory/project/calibre) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/calibre.md)
- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/calibre-vs-transcriber