# cadvisor vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cadvisor | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 19 505 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.60.6 · 18 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

cadvisor scores 72/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

cadvisor ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, cadvisor is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

cadvisor is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cadvisor](https://selfhost.directory/project/cadvisor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cadvisor.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cadvisor-vs-windows-arm