cadvisorvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cadvisor | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 19 505 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.60.6 · 18 Sept 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
cadvisor scores 72/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
cadvisor ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; cadvisor needs more configuration.
cadvisor is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).
cadvisor details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep cadvisor, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with