cadvisorvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cadvisor | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 19 505 | 5 277 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 27 |
| Latest release | v0.60.6 · 18 Sept 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
cadvisor scores 72/100 against 71/100 for Umbraco CMS, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for cadvisor.
If you want the quickest setup, cadvisor is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
cadvisor is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).
cadvisor details →Umbraco CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep cadvisor, compare it with
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with