cadvisorvsTelegraf
Two self-hosted Monitoring & observability projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cadvisor | Telegraf | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 19 505 | 17 886 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +62 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 16 |
| Latest release | v0.60.6 · 18 Sept 2026 | v1.40.2 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Telegraf scores 78/100 against 72/100 for cadvisor, so it is the safer default.
Telegraf ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for cadvisor.
If you want the quickest setup, Telegraf is easier to run; cadvisor needs more configuration.
cadvisor details →Telegraf details →All Monitoring & observability projects →
Swap a project
Keep cadvisor, compare it with
Keep Telegraf, compare it with