# cadvisor vs Tasmota

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cadvisor | Tasmota |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 19 504 | 24 938 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +166 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.60.6 · 18 Sept 2026 | v16.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Tasmota scores 79/100 against 72/100 for cadvisor, so it is the safer default.

cadvisor ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tasmota.

If you want the quickest setup, cadvisor is easier to run; Tasmota needs more configuration.

Tasmota is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cadvisor](https://selfhost.directory/project/cadvisor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cadvisor.md)
- [Tasmota](https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cadvisor-vs-tasmota