# cadvisor vs Semaphore UI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cadvisor | Semaphore UI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 19 505 ✓ | 14 334 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +151 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.60.6 · 18 Sept 2026 | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Semaphore UI scores 73/100 against 72/100 for cadvisor, so it is the safer default.

Semaphore UI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for cadvisor.

If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; cadvisor needs more configuration.

Semaphore UI is growing faster right now (+151 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cadvisor](https://selfhost.directory/project/cadvisor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cadvisor.md)
- [Semaphore UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cadvisor-vs-semaphore-ui