# cadvisor vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cadvisor | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 19 506 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.60.6 · 18 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

cadvisor scores 72/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

cadvisor ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

cadvisor is growing faster right now (+63 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cadvisor](https://selfhost.directory/project/cadvisor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cadvisor.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cadvisor-vs-scada-lts