# Caddy vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Caddy | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 78 523 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 488 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Caddy scores 90/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Caddy.

If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 488 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Caddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/caddy-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s