Caddyvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Caddy | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 78 540 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 478 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Caddy scores 90/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Caddy.
If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.
Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 478 stars in 30 days).
Caddy details →wyoming-piper details →
Swap a project
Keep Caddy, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with