CaddyvsWebSSH
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Caddy | WebSSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #2 of 6 in SSH |
| GitHub stars | 78 518 | 224 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 483 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | v2.6.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Caddy scores 90/100 against 50/100 for WebSSH, so it is the safer default.
WebSSH ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Caddy.
If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; WebSSH needs more configuration.
Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 483 stars in 30 days).
Caddy details →WebSSH details →
Swap a project
Keep Caddy, compare it with
Keep WebSSH, compare it with