# Caddy vs voidaccess

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Caddy | voidaccess |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 78 518 ✓ | 948 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 483 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Caddy scores 90/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Caddy.

If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.

Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 483 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Caddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy.md)
- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/caddy-vs-voidaccess