# Caddy vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Caddy | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 78 547 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 485 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Caddy scores 90/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

unbagrnd ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Caddy.

Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 485 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Caddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/caddy-vs-unbagrnd