CaddyvsUglyFeed
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Caddy | UglyFeed | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 78 537 | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 475 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Caddy scores 90/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.
Caddy ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for UglyFeed.
If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; UglyFeed needs more configuration.
Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 475 stars in 30 days).
Caddy details →UglyFeed details →
Swap a project
Keep Caddy, compare it with
Keep UglyFeed, compare it with