# Caddy vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Caddy | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 78 518 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 483 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Caddy scores 90/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Caddy.

If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Caddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/caddy-vs-tradingagents