# Caddy vs teslamateapi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Caddy | teslamateapi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #3 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 78 532 ✓ | 257 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 470 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.25.0 · 7 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Caddy scores 90/100 against 46/100 for teslamateapi, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; teslamateapi needs more configuration.

Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 470 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Caddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy.md)
- [teslamateapi](https://selfhost.directory/project/teslamateapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/teslamateapi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/caddy-vs-teslamateapi