# Caddy vs TailGuard

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Caddy | TailGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #37 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 78 522 ✓ | 611 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 487 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | v1.104.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Caddy scores 90/100 against 48/100 for TailGuard, so it is the safer default.

TailGuard ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Caddy.

If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; TailGuard needs more configuration.

Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 487 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Caddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy.md)
- [TailGuard](https://selfhost.directory/project/tailguard) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tailguard.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/caddy-vs-tailguard