CaddyvsShiny Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Caddy | Shiny Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #2 of 20 in Application Management |
| GitHub stars | 78 523 | 763 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 461 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Caddy scores 90/100 against 57/100 for Shiny Server, so it is the safer default.
Caddy ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shiny Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; Shiny Server needs more configuration.
Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 461 stars in 30 days).
Caddy details →Shiny Server details →
Swap a project
Keep Caddy, compare it with
Keep Shiny Server, compare it with