CaddyvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Caddy | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 78 528 | 35 514 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 466 | +1 682 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Caddy scores 90/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
Caddy ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
Caddy details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Caddy, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with