# Caddy vs Request Tracker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Caddy | Request Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 78 533 ✓ | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 471 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 ✓ | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Perl |

## Which one should you pick?

Caddy scores 90/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.

Caddy ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.

If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.

Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 471 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Caddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy.md)
- [Request Tracker](https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/caddy-vs-request-tracker