# Caddy vs RabbitMQ

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Caddy | RabbitMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 78 533 ✓ | 13 950 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 471 ✓ | +75 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Caddy scores 90/100 against 77/100 for RabbitMQ, so it is the safer default.

RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Caddy.

If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.

Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 471 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Caddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy.md)
- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/caddy-vs-rabbitmq