CaddyvsRabbitMQ
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Caddy | RabbitMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 78 533 | 13 950 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 471 | +75 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 14 |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Caddy scores 90/100 against 77/100 for RabbitMQ, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Caddy.
If you want the quickest setup, Caddy is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.
Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 471 stars in 30 days).
Caddy details →RabbitMQ details →
Swap a project
Keep Caddy, compare it with
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with