# Caddy vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Caddy | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Web Servers | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 78 537 ✓ | 589 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 475 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.11.7 · 3 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Caddy scores 90/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Caddy.

Caddy is growing faster right now (+2 475 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Caddy](https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/caddy.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/caddy-vs-qm-music