# C-SSH vs WeTTY

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | C-SSH | WeTTY |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 6 in SSH | #6 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 187 | 5 478 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +31 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.7 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.2.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

WeTTY scores 69/100 against 38/100 for C-SSH, so it is the safer default.

WeTTY ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for C-SSH.

If you want the quickest setup, WeTTY is easier to run; C-SSH needs more configuration.

WeTTY is growing faster right now (+31 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [C-SSH](https://selfhost.directory/project/c-ssh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/c-ssh.md)
- [WeTTY](https://selfhost.directory/project/wetty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wetty.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/c-ssh-vs-wetty