# ByteStash vs vLLM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ByteStash | vLLM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #41 of 166 in Developer Tools | #3 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 2 569 | 95 785 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +3 233 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.32.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

vLLM scores 91/100 against 60/100 for ByteStash, so it is the safer default.

vLLM ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for ByteStash.

If you want the quickest setup, ByteStash is easier to run; vLLM needs more configuration.

vLLM is growing faster right now (+3 233 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ByteStash](https://selfhost.directory/project/bytestash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bytestash.md)
- [vLLM](https://selfhost.directory/project/vllm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vllm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bytestash-vs-vllm