# ByteStash vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ByteStash | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #41 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 2 569 | 78 732 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +2 008 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 60/100 for ByteStash, so it is the safer default.

ByteStash ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.

If you want the quickest setup, ByteStash is easier to run; unsloth needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 008 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ByteStash](https://selfhost.directory/project/bytestash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bytestash.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bytestash-vs-unsloth