# ByteStash vs twinny

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ByteStash | twinny |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #41 of 166 in Developer Tools | #16 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 2 569 | 3 685 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.0.20 · 22 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

twinny scores 63/100 against 60/100 for ByteStash, so it is the safer default.

ByteStash ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for twinny.

If you want the quickest setup, ByteStash is easier to run; twinny needs more configuration.

ByteStash is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ByteStash](https://selfhost.directory/project/bytestash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bytestash.md)
- [twinny](https://selfhost.directory/project/twinny) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twinny.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bytestash-vs-twinny