# ByteStash vs pr-agent

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ByteStash | pr-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #41 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 2 569 | 13 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +550 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 23 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.49.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

pr-agent scores 77/100 against 60/100 for ByteStash, so it is the safer default.

pr-agent ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for ByteStash.

If you want the quickest setup, ByteStash is easier to run; pr-agent needs more configuration.

pr-agent is growing faster right now (+550 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ByteStash](https://selfhost.directory/project/bytestash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bytestash.md)
- [pr-agent](https://selfhost.directory/project/pr-agent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pr-agent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bytestash-vs-pr-agent