# bytebin vs Onetime Secret

> Two self-hosted [Pastebin alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/pastebin), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bytebin | Onetime Secret |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #65 of 86 in File Sharing | #6 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 134 | 2 978 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +36 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 29 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.26.19 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Onetime Secret scores 61/100 against 43/100 for bytebin, so it is the safer default.

Onetime Secret ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for bytebin.

If you want the quickest setup, bytebin is easier to run; Onetime Secret needs more configuration.

Onetime Secret is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bytebin](https://selfhost.directory/project/bytebin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bytebin.md)
- [Onetime Secret](https://selfhost.directory/project/onetime-secret) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/onetime-secret.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bytebin-vs-onetime-secret