# Bytebase vs Huly

> Two self-hosted [Jira alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/jira), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Bytebase | Huly |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 40 in Database Management | #4 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 651 | 28 002 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 | +241 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 3.24.0 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.426 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | EPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Huly scores 74/100 against 71/100 for Bytebase, so it is the safer default.

Bytebase ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Huly.

If you want the quickest setup, Bytebase is easier to run; Huly needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Bytebase](https://selfhost.directory/project/bytebase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bytebase.md)
- [Huly](https://selfhost.directory/project/huly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huly.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bytebase-vs-huly