BunkerWebvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 11 132 | 6 518 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +135 | +107 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
BunkerWeb ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, BunkerWeb is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
BunkerWeb details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with