BunkerWebvswlgblock
Two self-hosted Security projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | wlgblock | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 34/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #72 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 11 133 | 177 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
BunkerWeb scores 71/100 against 34/100 for wlgblock, so it is the safer default.
BunkerWeb ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for wlgblock.
If you want the quickest setup, BunkerWeb is easier to run; wlgblock needs more configuration.
BunkerWeb is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).
BunkerWeb details →wlgblock details →All Security projects →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep wlgblock, compare it with