# BunkerWeb vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BunkerWeb | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 11 134 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

BunkerWeb scores 71/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

BunkerWeb is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BunkerWeb](https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bunkerweb-vs-uusec-waf