BunkerWebvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 11 133 | 56 868 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 | +139 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
BunkerWeb ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; BunkerWeb needs more configuration.
BunkerWeb details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with