# BunkerWeb vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BunkerWeb | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 11 135 | 16 648 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 | +249 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 49 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

trigger scores 76/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for BunkerWeb.

If you want the quickest setup, BunkerWeb is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

## Details

- [BunkerWeb](https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bunkerweb-vs-trigger