# BunkerWeb vs Apache Tika

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BunkerWeb | Apache Tika |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 11 133 ✓ | 4 114 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 ✓ | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

BunkerWeb scores 71/100 against 68/100 for Apache Tika, so it is the safer default.

BunkerWeb ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.

BunkerWeb is growing faster right now (+136 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BunkerWeb](https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bunkerweb.md)
- [Apache Tika](https://selfhost.directory/project/tika) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tika.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bunkerweb-vs-tika