BunkerWebvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 11 133 | 4 114 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
BunkerWeb scores 71/100 against 68/100 for Apache Tika, so it is the safer default.
BunkerWeb ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
BunkerWeb is growing faster right now (+136 stars in 30 days).
BunkerWeb details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with